dc.contributor.author | Darcy, Shane | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-09-16T09:45:35Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2011-09-16T09:45:35Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Darcy, Shane. (2011). Defences to international crimes. In William A. Schabas & Nadia Bernaz (Eds.), Handbook of International Criminal Law (pp. 231-245): Routledge. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10379/2147 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The label 'defences' can be used to describe a range of excusing or justificatory answers to a criminal charge, or as 'grounds for excluding criminal responsibility',
according to Article 31 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Defences are often categorized as excuses or justifications, with a justification being a
challenge as to whether the act was wrongful and an excuse involving acceptance that
the act was wrongful but seeking to avoid attribution of criminal responsibility. This
chapter addresses defences to international crimes and is structured in two parts; the
first considers those defences which have a counterpart in domestic criminal laws,
such as duress, self-defence, mistake, or mental incapacity, and the second those defences which can be considered in some ways unique to international criminal law,
such as superior orders and reprisal. | en |
dc.format | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | |
dc.subject | Defences | en |
dc.subject | International criminal law | en |
dc.subject | Crimes | en |
dc.subject | Liability | en |
dc.subject | Irish Centre for Human Rights | en |
dc.title | Defences to international crimes | en |
dc.type | Book chapter | en |
dc.description.peer-reviewed | peer-reviewed | en |
nui.item.downloads | 18469 | |