ARAN - Access to Research at NUI Galway

Representation of Cancer in the Medical Literature - A Bibliometric Analysis

ARAN - Access to Research at NUI Galway

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Glynn, Ronan W. en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-05-25T12:08:56Z en
dc.date.available 2011-05-25T12:08:56Z en
dc.date.issued 2010-10 en
dc.identifier.citation Glynn RW, Chin JZ, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ,( 2010) Representation of Cancer in the Medical Literature - A Bibliometric Analysis. PLoS ONE 5(11): e13902. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013902 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10379/1933 en
dc.description.abstract Background:There exists a lack of knowledge regarding the quantity and quality of scientific yield in relation to individual cancer types. We aimed to measure the proportion, quality and relevance of oncology-related articles, and to relate this output to their associated disease burden. By incorporating the impact factor(IF) and Eigenfactor¿(EF) into our analysis we also assessed the relationship between these indices and the output under study. Methods:All publications in 2007 were retrieved for the 26 most common cancers. The top 20 journals ranked by IF and EF in general medicine and oncology, and the presence of each malignancy within these titles was analysed. Journals publishing most prolifically on each cancer were identified and their impact assessed. Principal Findings 63260 (PubMed) and 126845 (WoS) entries were generated, respectively. 26 neoplasms accounted for 25% of total output from the top medical publications. 5 cancers dominated the first quartile of output in the top oncology journals; breast, prostate, lung, and intestinal cancer, and leukaemia. Journals associated with these cancers were associated with much higher IFs and EFs than those journals associated with the other cancer types under study, although these measures were not equivalent across all sub-specialties. In addition, yield on each cancer was related to its disease burden as measured by its incidence and prevalence. Conclusions:Oncology enjoys disproportionate representation in the more prestigious medical journals. 5 cancers dominate yield, although this attention is justified given their associated disease burden. The commonly used IF and the recently introduced EF do not correlate in the assessment of the preeminent oncology journals, nor at the level of individual malignancies; there is a need to delineate between proxy measures of quality and the relevance of output when assessing its merit. These results raise significant questions regarding the best method of assessment of research and scientific output in the field of oncology. en
dc.format application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Surgery en
dc.title Representation of Cancer in the Medical Literature - A Bibliometric Analysis en
dc.type Article en
dc.local.publishedsource http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013902 en
dc.description.peer-reviewed peer-reviewed en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record