Austerity as retrogression: The rights to adequate housing and social security in the United Kingdom and Ireland
View/ Open
Date
2024-02-13Author
Shokar, Poonam
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 101 (view details)
Abstract
Austerity measures adopted by State Parties since 2008 had a detrimental impact on
social housing and welfare, deteriorating the enjoyment of the rights to housing and social
security under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The
doctrine of non-retrogression – the obligation prohibiting State Parties from taking
backwards steps in the enjoyment of Covenant rights – holds immense potential in
holding State Parties accountable for adopting austerity measures which deteriorate the
enjoyment of Covenants rights.
The thesis attempts to categorise the use of austerity measures by the United Kingdom
and Ireland as contrary to the doctrine of non-retrogression under the Covenant in
relation to the enjoyment of the rights to adequate housing and social security. To achieve
this, a two-pronged assessment of deliberately retrogressive measures is carried out:
first, the State Party intention in adopting austerity measures is examined; second, a
normative and empirical assessment of the doctrine of non-retrogression is conducted in
relation to social housing and welfare legislation and policies adopted by the United
Kingdom and Ireland from 2008 to 2021.
The thesis is interdisciplinary in its approach. First, both the doctrine of non retrogression and austerity are unpacked, relying upon the disciplines of law, political
philosophy and political economy to establish an overall framework to analyse
deliberately retrogressive measures. Second, a doctrinal analysis of the rights to adequate
housing and social security is undertaken to tailor a criterion for determining
retrogression specifically for these rights. Third, a qualitative socio-legal analysis of
British and Irish parliamentary budget debates is conducted to gauge whether the
measures adopted by the State Parties were intended to be deliberately retrogressive.
Finally, British and Irish social housing and welfare policies and legislation adopted from
2008 to 2021 are assessed from a normative and empirical perspective to determine
whether they are deliberately retrogressive.
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Risk in adult social care: Perceptions and experiences of risk in disability services in Ireland
Velartova, Jaroslava (NUI Galway, 2021-03-21)The principles of autonomy, choice, and independence have been prevalent in the rhetoric used to initiate policy change in disability services in recent decades. As part of this rhetoric, it has been stressed increasingly ... -
The Human Rights Triangle: Transnational Corporations, International Human Law and Regional Cooperation in the Context of Development
Jason, Snyder (2013-01-29)Following World War II, the allied powers sought to improve global financial stability and ensure that basic rights were codified and protected at the international level. The UN Charter and the Bretton Woods agreements ... -
Women’s rights as human rights: 25 years on
Reilly, Niamh; Bunch, Charlotte (Springer, 2019-05-22)“Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Toward a Re-Vision of Human Rights,” by Charlotte Bunch (published in Human Rights Quarterly in 1990), is considered a classic text in the field of women’s human rights. In it, Bunch set ...